CAB148-30-Defence and Oversea Policy Committee Meetings Relating to 1967 Disturbances-1967 — Page 43

National Archives 英國國家檔案館 All

SECRET

Page 43

Furthermore, while the facilities which we wished to retain in Malta

after the run down were not vital to our strategy, they were valuable:

without them our commitment to assist in the defence of Libya would

require substantial revision, and it would be difficult for the two

headquarters of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation to continue in

Malta.

(97792)

Page 43

Our best course was therefore to seek to help Dr. Olivier to

withdraw from his present extrene position. We should in no circumstances

alter our decision to reduce our forces over a period of four years; and

we should concentrate on means of helping the Maltese to meet the

economic consequences of our withdrawal of forces rather than on a

rephasing of the reductions. It should be a precondition that the

Maltese terminated the harassment of our forces and did not continue with

the visiting forces gislation; we should offer to discuss methods of

helping Malta such as the proposed industrial commission, the setting up

of the Malta Development Corporation which we had earlier proposed, and

the nationalisation of the Malta Dockyard in order to resolve the present

legal impasse with Baileys (Malta) Ltd. But we should also have to offer

some rephasing of the run down of forces since otherwise Dr. Olivier would

be politically unable to accept the offer of negotiations. Officials in

the Ministry of Defence had studied the run down programme to see how far heavy redundancy in the first two years, in particular in 1967-68, could

be avoided: it appeared that a rephasing was possible at some cost both

financial and, in the extreme case, in terms of the operational

efficiency of naval frigates. Of a number of possibilities, the one

offering maximum relief to Malta would cost us about £1 million a year

three over the four years and would bring the reduction in civilian labour

down to a level which was no more severe in any one year than it had been

the

gradual over the previous years since 1961 of/reduction of British forces in

Malta.

We should however avoid if possible agreeing to the maximun and

should certainly start with a minimum offer so as to leave the greatest

possible room for mancouvre.

THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARY recalled that the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Commonwelath Affairs (Lord Beswick) had visited

Malta in August 1966 for discussions on our run down on the basis of its

being completed within two years. As a result of Maltese reactions in

these discussions Ministers had reconsidered the matter and had agreed

that he himself should go to Malta to make a final offer of a run down

over a period of four years. His discussions in Malta had demonstrated

the unwillingness of the Malta Government to discuss any programme for a

run down of our forces. During his visit to Malta he had also had discussions with Mr. Kingswell of the Malta General Workers Union, who

-2-

SECRET

Page 43

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.